Preview

National Health Care (Russia)

Advanced search

Proposals for medical guidelines creation at the time of digital transformation of healthcare in Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.47093/2713-069X.2024.5.2.36-47

Abstract

The article presents the experience of the «National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov» in creation of medical guidelines based on the patient’s route business process for vertically integrated medical information system for “Obstetrics and gynecology” and “Neonatology” (VIMIS “AKiNEO”), with simultaneous digitization of the document, describes the advantages of this an approach before the classical form of writing document.
Aim. To conduct a comparative analysis of approaches to writing a medical guideline based on a digitized medical guideline and patient’s route business process for VIMIS “AKiNEO” and in the classical way.
Materials and methods. The content of digitized medical guidelines and procedures for the provision of medical care, formed by experts on the basis of the “National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov” with the methodological support of the Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control were used. The assessment of the methodological advantages of writing medical guidelines based on patient routes business processes in comparison with writing in the classical way was carried out using methods of analysis and synthesis.
Results. Experts have created 17 patient routes using the content of digitized medical guidelines for immersion in the VIMIS “AKiNEO”. These routes fully reflect the amount and timing of medical interventions necessary to ensure the quality of medical care. Methodological approaches for writing medical guidelines based patient routes business processes have been developed. It has been demonstrated that digitizing the content of medical guidelines and medical care procedures, describing medical guidelines in the form of a business process diagram, identify “zones of uncertainty” that ar e not visible in the text document, and can significantly affec t the quality of medical care to the patient.
Conclusion. The creation of regulatory legal acts on the organization and provision of medical care and medical guidelines in modern conditions of healthcare digital transformation should take place after digitizing the text of the document and creating a business process for the patient’s route, which will improve the quality of these documents.

About the Authors

I. A. Prialukhin
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov; State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation – Federal Medical Biophysical Center named after A.I. Burnazyan
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Prialukhin – Cand. of Sci. (Medicine), specialist expert, Center for Digital Transformation of Healthcare; Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health and Healthcare with a course in medical and social examination

Akademika Oparina str., 4, Moscow, 117513

Novoshchukinskaya str., 7/1, Moscow, 123098



E. L. Sheshko
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Elena L. Sheshko – Cand. of Sci. (Medicine), Director of the Department of Medical Care for Children, Obstetrics and Public Health Services

Rakhmanovsky Lane, 3, Moscow, 127994



Yu. V. Seryapina
Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control
Russian Federation

Yuliya V. Seryapina – Head of the Department of Healthcare Informatization Methodology

Khokhlovsky Lane, 10/5, Moscow, 109028



A. N. Plutnitskiy
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Andrey N. Plutnitsky – Dr. of Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Deputy

Rakhmanovsky Lane, 3, Moscow, 127994



P. S. Pugachev
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Pavel S. Pugachev – Deputy Minister

Rakhmanovsky Lane, 3, Moscow, 127994



V. V. Omelyanovskiy
Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control
Russian Federation

Vitaly V. Omelyanovskiy – Dr. of Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Director General

Khokhlovsky Lane, 10/5, Moscow, 109028



O. R. Artemova
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Oliya R. Artemova – Deputy Director, Department of Digital Development and Information Technologies

Rakhmanovsky Lane, 3, Moscow, 127994



T. V. Pugacheva
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation

Tatyana V. Pugacheva – Head of the Center for Digital Transformation of Healthcare

Akademika Oparina str., 4, Moscow, 117513



N. V. Dolgushina
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Dolgushina – Dr. of Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Deputy Director – Head of the Department of Organization of Scientific Activities

Akademika Oparina str., 4, Moscow, 117513



A. A. Verhovtsev
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation

Andrey A. Verhovtsev – Deputy Head of the Center for Digital Transformation of Healthcare

Akademika Oparina str., 4, Moscow, 117513



E. S. Akhapkina
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation

Elena S. Akhapkina – specialist expert, Center for Digital Transformation of Healthcare

Akademika Oparina str., 4, Moscow, 117513



T. A. Kirpa-Ivanov
LLC “Cifromaed”
Russian Federation

Timofey A. Kirpa-Ivanov – expert-analyst

Presnenskaya emb., 10, Moscow, 123112



G. T. Sukhikh
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation

Gennadiy T. Sukhikh – Academician of the RAS, Dr. of Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Director

Akademika Oparina str., 4, Moscow, 117513



References

1. Kovaleva M.Y., Sukhorukikh O.A. Clinical guidelines. History of creation and development in the Russian Federation and abroad. Remedium. 2019; 1–2: 6–14 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21518/1561-5936-2019-1-2-6-14

2. Knyazev E.G., Samchenko A.А., Riumkin K.V. The formation of a system to support medical decision-making based on the digitization of clinical guidelines using formal logic tools. Quality Management in Medicine. 2019; 4: 52–57 (In Russian). EDN DILWVS.

3. Sukhikh G.T., Pugachev P.S., Artemova O.R., et al. The role of vertically integrated medical information system “Obstetrics and gynecology” and “Neonatology” in the digital transformation of maternal and child healthcare. National Health Care (Russia). 2021; 2(3): 18–28 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.3.18-28

4. Strasser M., Pfeifer F., Helm E., et al. Defining and reconstructing clinical processes based on IHE and BPMN 2.0. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 169: 482–486. PMID: 21893796.

5. Peleg M. Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review. J Biomed Inform. 2013; 46(4): 744–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.009

6. Engalychev D.N., Khodovskiy A.A., Levin M.B. Methodological approaches for the development of a digital clinical recommendation. HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT: News, Views, Education. Bulletin of VSHOUZ. 2021; 7(3): 70–81 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33029/2411-8621-2021-7-3-70-81

7. Latoszek-Berendsen A., Tange H., Van den Herik H.J., Hasman A. From clinical practice guidelines to computer-interpretable guidelines. A literature overview. Methods Inf Med. 2010; 49(6): 550–570. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME10-01-0056

8. González-Ferrer A., Valcárcel M.Á., Cuesta M., et al. Development of a computerinterpretable clinical guideline model for decision support in the differential diagnosis of hyponatremia. Int J Med Inform. 2017; 103: 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.014

9. García-Sáez G., Rigla M., Martínez-Sarriegui I., et al. Patient-oriented Computerized Clinical Guidelines for Mobile Decision Support in Gestational Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8(2): 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296814526492

10. Sadeghi-Ghyassi F., Damanabi S., Kalankesh L.R., et al. How are ontologies implemented to represent clinical practice guidelines in clinical decision support systems: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2022; 11: 183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02063-7


Review

For citations:


Prialukhin I.A., Sheshko E.L., Seryapina Yu.V., Plutnitskiy A.N., Pugachev P.S., Omelyanovskiy V.V., Artemova O.R., Pugacheva T.V., Dolgushina N.V., Verhovtsev A.A., Akhapkina E.S., Kirpa-Ivanov T.A., Sukhikh G.T. Proposals for medical guidelines creation at the time of digital transformation of healthcare in Russian Federation. National Health Care (Russia). 2024;5(2):36-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47093/2713-069X.2024.5.2.36-47

Views: 705


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-069X (Print)
ISSN 2713-0703 (Online)