The prevalence of the use of publicly available digital communication technologies by doctors in professional communication with patients

In addition to officially authorized information resources, doctors of medical organizations widely use publicly available means of digital communication in professional communication with patients, which poses a threat to the disclosure of personal data and information about the patient’s health status.

Aim. To study the frequency of use of publicly available digital means of communication by doctors in professional communication with patients.

Materials and methods. A survey based on author’s questionnaires of 240 doctors, among whom 36.6 ± 3.1% worked in a polyclinic, 18.3 ± 2.4% – in a rural hospital, 45.1 ± 3.2% – in a multidisciplinary urban hospital. Among the respondents were representatives of various age groups and medical specialties.

Results. According to the survey results, only 18.2 ± 2.5% of respondents do not use publicly available digital technologies when communicating with patients. Doctors mainly use messengers (Whatsapp, Viber and others) (44.6 ± 3.2% of respondents), e-mail (24.5 ± 2.8%), less often social networks (12.6 ± 2.1%). As doctors move into older age groups, they use digital technologies less often to communicate with patients (p = 0.045), communication with patients using digital means of communication is more common among male doctors than among female doctors (p = 0.04). The number of doctors using digital technologies in communicating with patients in the city hospital turned out to be significantly higher compared to the central district hospital (p < 0.0001) and polyclinic (p < 0.0001). Doctors of therapeutic specialties are less likely to use digital technologies to communicate with a patient than specialists in surgical specialties (p = 0.04).

Conclusion. The results of the study indicate a high prevalence of the use of publicly available digital communication tools by doctors when communicating with patients: 81.8 ± 2.5% of respondents reported such a practice. At the same time, such unsecured communication channels as messengers and e-mail are the most in demand.

1. Kraynev V.Yu. The problem of digitalization of modern society. Russian Economic Bulletin. 2022; 5(3): 37–40 (In Russian). EDN: OKXJFL

2. Dmitrieva E.V. Patient – Health Care Provider Communication in the Digital Era. Communicology. 2020; 8(3): 150–162 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-30652020-8-3-150-162. EDN: WVQEAP

3. Choloyan S.B., Ekimov A.K., Baigazina E.N., et al. About the ability of the Uniformstate Health Information System to solve management problems. Manager Zdravoohranenia. 2022; 1: 66–78 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21045/1811-0185-2022-1-66-78. EDN: VZVKQM

4. Khalfin R.A., Madyanova V.V., Kachkova O.E., et al. Patient-Centered Medicine: Background to the Transformation and Components. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2019; 23(1): 104–114 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0245-2019-23-1-104-114. EDN: WJEFYV

5. Osmanov E.M., Reshetnikov A.V., Lebedev G.S., et al. The mobile applications developed for self-control arterial pressure: systematic review and content-analysis. Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine. 2024; 32(1): 35–42 (In Russian).

6. http://dx.doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-1-35-42. EDN: DNCSNY

7. Borodina K.M. The use of social networks for the purpose of their own promotion and promotion of health in medical education. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 2021; 10(4 (37)): 25–27 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26140/bgz3-2021-1004-0004. EDN: TGYVYI

8. Vladzymyrskyy A.V. Systematic review: the messengers “WhatsApp®” and “Viber®” in a clinical routine. The journal of telemedicine and eHealth. 2017; 1(3): 30–41 (In Russian). EDN: YPTUYR

9. Shaderkin I.A. Remote monitoring of human health and the environment: opportunities and limitations. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2022; 8(3): 45–54 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2022-8-3-45-54. EDN: QKWIVW

10. Lebedev G.S., Shepetovskaya N.L., Reshetnikov V.A. Telemedicine and mechanisms of its integration. National Health Care (Russia). 2021; 2 (2): 21–27 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.2.21-27. EDN: ELZEEI

11. Nikolaev V.A., Nikolaev A.A. Telerehabilitation system for post-stroke patients: management scheme. Manager Zdravoohranenia. 2021; 6: 60–70 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21045/1811-0185-2021-6-60-70. EDN: IHWXXT

12. Fedonnikov A.S. The on-line communication in organization of rehabilitation of patients of traumatological orthopedic profile. Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine. 2019; 27(6): 1064–1069 (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2019-27-6-1064-1069. EDN: IHWXXT

13. Bogomiagkova E.S., Orekh EA., Glukhova M.E. Telemedicine in Russian Megacities: Problems and Prospects. Sociological Journal. 2023; 29(3): 29–48 (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.3.2. EDN: CGWRRI

14. Reshetnikov A.V, Frolova I.A., Abaeva O.P., et al. Accessibility and quality of medical care for patients with chronic noncommunicable diseases during COVID-19 pandemic. NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. 2023; 33(1): 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533023-00328-9. EDN: XJPNRN

15. Medvedeva E.I., Aleksandrova O.A., Kroshilin S.V. Telemedicine in modern conditions: The attitude of society and the vector of development. Economic And Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2022; 15(3): 200–222 (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.15838/ esc.2022.3.81.11. EDN: DKCCHF

16. Fedotov N.E. Aspects of medical confidentiality protection in the use of telemedicine technology in healthcare. Comparative constitutional review. 2024; 33(1(158)): 40–59 (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2024-1-40-59. EDN: FLRCSX