Virtual reality as a way to modernize Russian medical education
https://doi.org/10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.3.47-54
Abstract
Recent trends in intense evolution of information technologies and improving of medical education increases the availability of advanced training for doctors. These changes promote development of health care and society. The purpose of educational process modification is to create an environment for students to apply modern technologies, which allows students to remain interested in the disciplines being studied. Technological advancement results in creating of multimedia technologies that are currently being used to improve learning outcomes. The availability of multimedia technologies, digital content, and software simplify educational materials and make it more efficient for the learning process, and therefore empowers students.
The article provides an overview on currently used educational programs for medical residents, as well as an analysis of the sociological and psychological characteristics of modern students in the context of rapidly developing digital technologies. The article describes the current issues of the educational process implementation, highlights the complexity of the work of medical organizations and universities. The paper discusses the existing methods of modernizing education that meet modern trends in the development of medicine. The study also offers some important insights into using the innovative technologies by foreign colleagues. This research proposes a new methodology of integrating virtual reality into dermatovenereologists and cosmetologists training programs for optimizitation the educational process, standardization students and residents knowledge control, and improvement the practical training of healthcare personnel.
About the Authors
A. A. Kubanov
State Scientific Research Center of Dermatovenerology and Cosmetology;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. of Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding member of the RAS, Director; head of Chair of dermatovenerology and cosmetology
Korolenko str., 3, b. 6, Moscow, 107076, Russia
Barrikadnaya str., 2/1, b. 1, Moscow, 125993, Russia
Yu. B. Mahakova
State Scientific Research Center of Dermatovenerology and Cosmetology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. of Sci. (Medicine), Head of educational department
Korolenko str., 3, b. 6, Moscow, 107076, Russia
I. V. Astakhova
State Scientific Research Center of Dermatovenerology and Cosmetology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
dermatovenerologist
Korolenko str., 3, b. 6, Moscow, 107076, Russia
References
1. Orusova O.V. How the coronavirus changed the system of higher education: analysis of the transition of universities to distance learning.Scientific review. Series 1: Economics and Law. 2020; 3: 184–195 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.26653/2076-4650-2020-3-17
2. Strauss W., Howe N. Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069. 1991. 540 p. ISBN 0-688-11912-3
3. Polyanok O.V., Schneider N.V., Safronova I.G. Features of students’ personality of y generation psychology. Problems of modern pedagogical education.2016; 51(3): 351–357 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25658099
4. Cilliers E.J. The challenge of teaching generation Z. People: International Journal of Social Sciences. 2017: 3(1): 188–198. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198
5. Bogdanov S., Sultanov K., Voscresensky A. Postmaterial values and orientations of generation z: digital natives and the education system of modern Russia. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2018; 187: 24–30 (In Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/postmaterialnye-tsennosti-i-zhiznennye-orientatsiipokoleniya-z-tsifrovaya-molodezh-v-obrazovatelnoy-sisteme-sovremennoy-rossii
6. Perlamutrov Yu.N., Zadionchenko E.V., Klyuchnikova D.E., Solov’ev A.M. New pedagogical approaches to teaching the Dermatovenereology. Klinicheskaya Dermatologiya i Venerologiya. 2018; 17(4): 124–130 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17116/klinderma201817041124
7. Sapa A.V. Generation Z is the generation of the FGOS era. Innovative projects and programs in education. 2014; 2: 24–30 (In Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pokolenie-z-pokolenie-epohi-fgos
8. Scalise K., Timms M., Moorjani A., et al. Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains. J Res Sci Teach. 2011; 48: 1050–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20437
9. Green K.R., Pinder-Grover T., Millunchick J.M. Impact of screencast technology: Connecting the perception of usefulness and the reality of performance. J Eng Educ. 2012; 101: 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01126.x
10. Molnar A. Content type and perceived multimedia quality in mobile learning. Multimed Tools Applications volume. 2017; 76: 21613–21627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-4062-2
11. Sharma P., Vleugels R.A., Nambudiri V.E. Augmented reality in dermatology: Are we ready for AR? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 81(5): 1216–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 12. PMID: 31302186
12. Obagi Z.A., Rundle C.W., Dellavalle R.P. Widening the scope of virtual reality and augmented reality in dermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2020; 26(1): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.5070/D3261047183
13. Moro C., Štromberga Z., Raikos A., et al. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017; 10(6): 549–559. PMID: 28419750. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1696
14. Lee E.A.-L., Wong K.W. A review of using virtual reality for learning. In: Pan Z, Cheok AD, Muller W (Editors). Transactions on Edutainment I. 1st Ed. Berlin, Germany: SpringerVerlag 2008; 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69744-2_18
15. Chittaro L., Ranon R. Web 3D technologies in learning, education and training: Motivations, issues, opportunities. Comput Educ 2007; 49: 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.002
16. Battulga B., Konishi T., Tamura Y., et al. The effectiveness of an interactive 3-dimensional computer graphics model for medical education. Interact J Med Res 2012; 1: e2. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.2172
17. Foo J.L., Martinez-Escobar M., Juhnke B., et al. Evaluating mental workload of twodimensional and three- dimensional visualization for anatomical structure localization. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013; 23: 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2012.0150.
18. Isdale J. IEEE Virtual Reality Conference Los Angeles, CA, USA: 2003. Introduction to VR Technology 2003; 302. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2003.1191178
19. Jayaram S., Sankar J., Judy V., et al. Assessment of VR technology and its applications to engineering problems. J Comput Inf Sci Eng. 2001; 1: 72. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1353846
20. Mihelj M., Novak D., Beguš S. Interaction with a virtual environment, Virtual Reality Technology and Applications, Springer Netherlands. 2014: 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6910-6_9
21. Leinen P., Green M.F., Esat T., et al. Virtual reality visual feedback for hand-controlled scanning probe microscopy manipulation of single molecules. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2015; 6: 2148–2153. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.6.220
22. Farahani N., Post R., Duboy J., et al. Exploring virtual reality technology and the Oculus Rift for the examination of digital pathology slides. J Pathol Inform. 2016; 7: 22. Published 2016 May 4. https://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.181766
23. Dyer E., Swartzlander B.J., Gugliucci M.R. Using virtual reality in medical education to teach empathy. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018; 106(4): 498–500. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.518
24. Bracq M.S., Michinov E., Jannin P. Virtual Reality Simulation in Nontechnical Skills Training for Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review. Simul Healthc. 2019; 14(3): 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000347
25. Pottle J. Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education. Future Healthc J. 2019; 6(3): 181–185. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0036. PMID: 31660522; PMCID: PMC6798020.
26. Alexandrova O.A., Yarasheva A.V., Nenahova Yu.S. Professional training of doctors: experts on the problems of the educational process (part two). Narodonasledie 2021; 24(1): 54–65 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2021.24.1.6
Review
For citations:
Kubanov A.A., Mahakova Yu.B., Astakhova I.V. Virtual reality as a way to modernize Russian medical education. National Health Care (Russia). 2021;2(3):47-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.3.47-54
Views:
1118
Email this article 